*Long post alert

*
The thing is, giving birth is a risk to both mom and baby. We have had ladies (and babies) on Moomie that had complications with both of these options. And someone said that every birth differs and that my positive experience with natural is not necessarily the norm.
Just my experiences before I conclude with, what is to me, the essence of the matter:
1st baby born 1 day before 35 weeks when my waters broke. NVD. 3.02kg (and big head, LOL). Never did my gynae say something like: "He is (will) be too big". Even with him being prem she didn't even mention a CS. True, for my specific circumstances it was the right decision. Got an episiotomy as I got a spinal block which made the pushing difficult. It took some time to heal, but I never thought it was a pain in the butt

. From waters braking to birth was 6 hours (therefore a positive experience for me).
2nd baby born on 38 weeks after being induced as the amniotic fluid was very little (not leaking, though). No pain relief this time... My advice? Get epidural before it is too late. I never knew giving birth could be so painful, and I have a very high pain threshold. From insertion of gel to birth was 3 hours 40 minutes and from 2cm to 8 in no time. My worst part of the experience (other than the pain) was the involuntary poo episode

. And that after the enema worked like a bomb (pun intended, LOL). At least only the nursing sister witnessed that. Got an episiotomy again, but a smaller one. Baby 3.375kg. Will the pain and the poo episode keep me from going natural again? Definitely not. I think that it could have been a less painful experience had I not been induced, but we couldn't really do it differently (natural induction did nothing for me).
With both I was on my feet shortly after the birth and couldn't wait for the drip to come out so I could take a bath. The episiotomies didn't bother me much and there were no other complications (except some placenta left behind with last birth, which could happen with CS as well). My gynae is wonderful and she respects your decision, whether it is natural or CS. She is a bit more pro-natural from what I have heard, but would not try to convince a CS mom to go natural.
So, my conclusion is: Make your decision (I know, I'm not really helping) and stick to it, but also be willing to change your decision. The difficult thing is if your gynae says a CS will be better for the baby and you don't know if it really is the case. Just don't let the gynae tell you the baby is big, so you must get a CS. That is BS. Firstly, the scan measurements are by no means accurate and secondly a big baby is not a good reason for a CS. When my 2nd was born, there were 29 babies in the ward. I had a look on the board as they indicate the type of delivery. Of those 29, only 4 were natural, of which I was one. Granted, it was before the long weekends of April, but still. Another indication that gynaes try to fit thing into their schedules. When asked about the type of birth by any of the nursing staff and the pead, I got the idea that they assumed it was a CS and was surprised when I indicated that it was not. This tells me it's getting very scarce to have a natural birth in a private hospital.
To conclude (really now...), a "funny" story from my stay in hospital: I talked to the one dad in the "dad's corner" where I was sitting with my daughter. He asked me about my baby's birth and I asked him about his. He said that the gynae said the baby was big and they could not take a chance with a natural birth. I saw him and the "big baby" the next day and I, having forgotten his comment about his big baby and the CS, told him his son looks so small and that compared to my daughter he is minute... That was no big baby and he could have been born vaginally had the mom chosen to. So that is the problem that I have with gynaes giving size as a reason for a CS. I have nothing against C sections, but I feel it is forced upon moms who would have loved to try for natural.